<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deriving Strength from Laziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/</link>
	<description>types, (co)monads, substructural logic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:34:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Comonad.Reader &#187; Elgot (Co)Algebras</title>
		<link>http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>The Comonad.Reader &#187; Elgot (Co)Algebras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>[...] So can we convert between an apomorphism and an Elgot algebra? For a somewhat circuitous path to that answer lets recall the definition of strength from my post a couple of weeks ago. Flipping the arguments and direction of application for strength to simplify what is coming we get: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So can we convert between an apomorphism and an Elgot algebra? For a somewhat circuitous path to that answer lets recall the definition of strength from my post a couple of weeks ago. Flipping the arguments and direction of application for strength to simplify what is coming we get: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Kmett</title>
		<link>http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Kmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>A follow-up in case anyone cares about this stuff. A lot can be said about &quot;the meaning of strength:&quot;

http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~robin/Theses/Strength.ps.gz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A follow-up in case anyone cares about this stuff. A lot can be said about &#8220;the meaning of strength:&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~robin/Theses/Strength.ps.gz" rel="nofollow">http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~robin/Theses/Strength.ps.gz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Comonad.Reader &#187; Zipping and Unzipping Functors</title>
		<link>http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>The Comonad.Reader &#187; Zipping and Unzipping Functors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>[...] Kefer asked a question in the comments of my post about (co)monadic (co)strength about Uustalu and Vene&#039;s ComonadZip class from p157 of The Essence of Dataflow Programming. The class in question is: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kefer asked a question in the comments of my post about (co)monadic (co)strength about Uustalu and Vene&#8217;s ComonadZip class from p157 of The Essence of Dataflow Programming. The class in question is: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kefer</title>
		<link>http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Kefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comonad.com/reader/2008/deriving-strength-from-laziness/#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>One of the Estonians&#039; comonadic papers talk about zippability: w a -&gt; w b -&gt; w (a,b). 

I definitely like to know what you thought about that concept and its dual, if any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the Estonians&#8217; comonadic papers talk about zippability: w a -&gt; w b -&gt; w (a,b). </p>
<p>I definitely like to know what you thought about that concept and its dual, if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
